Waste from Global Fashion Brands Contributing to Rights Abuses and Environmental Hazards in Cambodia: Investigation

Pre-consumer garment waste at some operational and permanently closed brick factories from as many as 19 international brands were found to be fuelling the kilns in Cambodia, exposing people to toxins and causing negative health and environmental impacts.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • Only six brands—Adidas; Cropp and Sinsay; Lululemon Athletica; Lupilu; Tilley Endurables; and, Venus Fashion—have confirmed receipt of the communication sent to them.
  • The ones who have failed to respond as yet are: C&A; Disney; Gap, Old Navy and Athleta; Karbon; Kiabi; No Boundaries (NOBO); Primark; Reebok; Sweaty Betty; Under Armour
  • It is possible that the proportion of operational brick factories burning garment waste has increased in recent years.
Workers have previously reported impacts including cough, cold, flu, nosebleed and lung inflammation. Nearby communities have also reported that the practice damages their crops and farmland.
Harmful Practice Workers have previously reported impacts including cough, cold, flu, nosebleed and lung inflammation. Nearby communities have also reported that the practice damages their crops and farmland. Several workers reported that burning garment waste caused them headaches and respiratory problems; another worker reported that it made her feel especially unwell during her pregnancies. Garment waste stored at one brick factory fuelled an uncontrolled fire, threatening workers’ safety. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights

Pre-consumer waste from leading global fashion brands continue to be burnt to fuel brick kilns in Cambodia, despite the risk of exposing people to toxins and causing negative health and environmental impacts, an investigation has revealed.

  • During visits to brick factories between April and September this year, the Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO) found pre-consumer garment waste at five operational and two permanently closed brick factories. 
  • These factories in Phnom Penh and Kandal province burnt pre-consumer garment waste to fuel brick kilns. LICADHO found waste marked with 19 international brands.
  • Only six have confirmed receipt of the communication sent to them:  Adidas; Cropp and Sinsay; Lululemon Athletica; Lupilu (owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co); Tilley Endurables (owned by Gibraltar & Company); and, Venus Fashion (owned by Otto GmbH & Co KG).
  • The ones who have failed to respond as yet are: C&A; Disney; Gap, Old Navy and Athleta; Karbon (owned by Schure Sports Inc); Kiabi; No Boundaries (NOBO) (owned by Walmart); Primark; Reebok (owned by Authentic Brands Group); Sweaty Betty (owned by owned by Wolverine World Wide, Inc); Under Armour.

The practice: Brick factories often mix wood with waste from the garment industry—which includes fabric cut-offs, plastic, rubber and other materials—to reduce the cost of fuelling kilns

  • Workers have previously reported impacts including cough, cold, flu, nosebleed and lung inflammation. Nearby communities have also reported that the practice damages their crops and farmland.
  • Several workers reported that burning garment waste caused them headaches and respiratory problems; another worker reported that it made her feel especially unwell during her pregnancies. Garment waste stored at one brick factory fuelled an uncontrolled fire, threatening workers’ safety.

The brands: LICADHO wrote to each of the brands identified or their parent companies in October 2023 to urge them to end, prevent and remedy these harms. All were given an opportunity to respond, and LICADHO informed them that their responses may be published as part of this report if received in time. 

As of 19 November, only six companies had replied.

  • Adidas indicated that they initiated an investigation;
  • Tilley Endurables said that they were taking other preventative action;
  • Lidl Stiftung & Co. requested to meet with LICADHO;
  • LPP requested additional time to reply; and
  • Lululemon Athletica acknowledged receipt of LICADHO’s letter.
The Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO) wrote to each of the brands identified or their parent companies in October 2023 to urge them to end, prevent and remedy these harms.
Left to Burn The Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO) wrote to each of the brands identified or their parent companies in October 2023 to urge them to end, prevent and remedy these harms. All were given an opportunity to respond, and LICADHO informed them that their responses may be published as part of this report if received in time. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights

Worsening situation: It is possible that the proportion of operational brick factories burning garment waste has increased in recent years, the report said.

  • Any garment brand sourcing from Cambodia are at risk of their products and waste harming debt-bonded workers, children and nearby communities.
  • Journalists and academics have previously identified waste at Cambodian brick factories from brands including Nike, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Reebok, Next, Diesel, Clarks, Marks and Spencer’s, George at Asda, Pull&Bear, J.Crew, Walmart and Old Navy.
  • It is possible that the proportion of operational brick factories burning garment waste has increased in recent years. An independent national survey of the brick industry conducted in 2019 found that 23 out of 465 brick factories used garment waste as fuel.
  • A Greenpeace Unearthed investigation reported that its use had increased in 2021, alongside declining brick factory profits. 
  • While not representative of the industry, LICADHO found garment waste at seven out of 20 brick factories visited this year.

Flouting laws: A 1999 Sub-Decree on Solid Waste Management defines clothing waste from the garment industry as hazardous, and outlines that its transportation and disposal sites are subject to a permit from the Ministry of Environment. 

  • A limited number of companies are licensed to transport and dispose of this waste. However, it has previously been documented that garment waste is often purchased and sold by a string of unlicensed intermediaries before it reaches brick kilns.
  • International apparel brands have largely failed to address the harm caused by the burning of garment waste in brick factories, despite prior public reporting on the issue and multiple brands being contacted about instances of their garment waste in brick kilns.
 
 
  • Dated posted: 21 November 2023
  • Last modified: 21 November 2023