New Report Dissects Producer-Reported Trends from Better Cotton’s First Ten Years in the United States

A new ten-year report from Better Cotton maps the evolution of cotton farming practices in the United States using producer-reported data. The report identifies regional contrasts and commonalities in areas such as soil health, biodiversity, irrigation, and pest management across the Southeast, Mid-South, Southwest, and Far West cotton regions.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • Better Cotton’s ten-year US review tracks progress across key farming practices, with emphasis on regional variation and self-reported producer data.
  • The report disaggregates patterns in irrigation, pest control, and soil health across the Southeast, Mid-South, Southwest, and Far West cotton-growing regions.
  • Data from producer self-assessments and post-harvest reports forms the basis of the findings in this 2024 Better Cotton publication.
The commitment of growers to accelerating sustainability efforts has helped optimise soil health and biodiversity, while reducing pesticide application and improving water use efficiency across the regions where Better Cotton operates.
Accelerating Efforts The commitment of growers to accelerating sustainability efforts has helped optimise soil health and biodiversity, while reducing pesticide application and improving water use efficiency across the regions where Better Cotton operates. Dermarcus Bowser / Better Cotton

Better Cotton’s decade-long engagement with US cotton producers has resulted in demonstrable shifts toward environmentally responsive practices, including improved fertiliser efficiency, increased irrigation precision, and wider adoption of biodiversity-supporting measures. These findings reflect a sector navigating economic constraints and ecological volatility while integrating long-term regenerative techniques across diverse production regions.

  • The report tracks changes in cover cropping, reduced tillage, integrated pest management, and irrigation efficiency based on self-reported data from licensed cotton producers across the US.
  • Adoption trends are presented for four regions — Southeast, Mid-South, Southwest, and Far West — each with different climatic, agronomic, and operational constraints affecting sustainability practices.

THE REPORT: The report provides a detailed review of Better Cotton’s ten-year engagement with licensed producers in the United States. It draws on a decade of data generated through annual producer self-assessments and post-harvest reports. These inputs tracked the adoption of sustainability-linked practices across themes including irrigation, pest management, soil health, and biodiversity. Methodological controls were applied to manage anomalies and ensure regional benchmarking of both adoption rates and contextual reporting.

  • The number of licensed producers ranged from 21 in 2014 to 631 in 2018/19, dropping to 325 by the 2023/24 cotton season.
  • Producers submitted annual data on yields, inputs, irrigation, and adoption of recommended practices across soil health, pest management, and biodiversity.
  • Findings were published each year in Results Indicator Reports and organised by production region to support comparison and trend analysis.
  • Where possible, producers were invited to explain year-on-year changes through optional narrative comments in their post-harvest forms.
  • Anomalous data was flagged, reviewed manually, and retained or excluded with supporting rationale included in each year’s reporting documentation.

CURRENT LANDSCAPE: The report disaggregates farm-level information by region, highlighting differences in scale, mechanisation, labour, and yield among the Southeast, Mid-South, Southwest, and Far West. Each region reflects unique climatic and agronomic conditions that shaped producers’ approach to sustainable practices. Mechanisation levels varied, as did irrigation dependency, which affected both inputs and yield outcomes.

  • The data illustrates how regional constraints and operational norms shaped sustainability priorities and capacities over the past decade.
  • Producers in the Far West averaged 4,100 acres per farm, compared to 1,000 acres in the Southeast and around 2,500 acres in the Mid-South.
  • The Far West recorded the highest yield at 1,560 pounds of lint per acre, with near-total reliance on supplemental irrigation systems.
  • Farms in the Mid-South averaged ten total owners and workers, reflecting mid-range labour requirements and mechanisation levels across that region.
  • Labour intensity was lowest in the Far West due to reliance on large equipment fleets, while the Southeast used more mixed systems.
  • Regional differences influenced practice choices, including fertiliser types, tillage methods, and biodiversity-enhancing interventions.

THE NUMBERS: The report includes trend charts showing shifts in adoption of practices related to soil management, biodiversity, pest control, and irrigation. Data reflects voluntary producer reporting and is not nationally weighted. Nonetheless, the patterns reveal consistent uptake of reduced tillage and crop rotation, as well as significant growth in cover cropping. Biodiversity-enhancing interventions varied more widely by region and year, influenced by local conditions and producer capacity to maintain ecological buffer zones.

  • Cover cropping rose from 48% of producers in 2015 to 65% in 2023, driven by soil conservation and water retention incentives in multiple regions.
  • Reduced tillage was adopted more widely over time, although the exact rate of increase varied between humid and arid production zones.
  • Crop rotation remained high, with more than 90% of producers in all regions reporting its consistent use as part of regular practice.
  • Irrigation-related practices were tracked only for those producers who indicated use of irrigation, and were not extrapolated to the full dataset.
Better Cotton plans to deepen regional activity in the US through expanded certification pilots, data refinement, and producer engagement.
Future Course Better Cotton plans to deepen regional activity in the US through expanded certification pilots, data refinement, and producer engagement. Pixabay

YES, BUT: The report cautions against interpreting all changes as linear improvements. Year-to-year fluctuations in practice adoption and outcomes were often linked to external stressors such as extreme weather, pest outbreaks, or resource constraints. In some cases, practices were dropped or scaled back temporarily. This underscores the role of environmental variability and operational feasibility in shaping the sustainability profile of US cotton farms, especially under unpredictable climatic and market pressures.

  • Heavy rainfall in several years prevented timely cover crop planting and delayed tillage activities across multiple southeastern counties.
  • Labour and equipment shortages reduced implementation of biodiversity buffers, especially in low-margin areas of the Southwest and Mid-South.
  • Report authors caution that results are context-sensitive and should not be compared across regions without adjusting for local variability.

THE CONTEXT: The report situates the US programme within Better Cotton’s broader Large Farm Programme, which includes Brazil, Australia, and Türkiye. It highlights multi-country collaboration through shared learning mechanisms such as field visits and symposia. By comparing mechanised systems in different settings, the programme enables producers and partners to align around common challenges and innovation strategies, including traceability pilots, decent work frameworks, and ecosystem restoration approaches tailored to regional contexts.

  • Producer delegations from participating countries attend Large Farm Week events to exchange lessons on practices, tools, and verification processes.
  • Themes include regenerative framing, mechanised cotton system upgrades, traceability pilot experiences, and stakeholder engagement strategies.
  • Certification pathways are in pilot stages across multiple countries, each with region-specific verification and chain-of-custody protocols.
  • Field events also serve as a forum for direct dialogue between growers and brands seeking traceability into farm-level practices.
  • The Large Farm Dialogue platform, initiated in 2022, enables continued contact and thematic exchange between in-person gatherings.

TAKING IT FROM HERE: Better Cotton plans to deepen regional activity in the US through expanded certification pilots, data refinement, and producer engagement. Future efforts will focus on improving outcome tracking and integrating multi-source data. The programme aims to respond to stakeholder demand for greater transparency, while building producer capacity through field events and benchmarking. Planned activities will maintain a regional lens to reflect variability in adoption and impact across cotton systems.

  • Certification pilots with US producers will expand in 2025 and will include more rigorous outcome verification protocols and traceability tracking.
  • Producer self-assessments and post-harvest reporting will continue annually, with refinements based on feedback and cross-country comparison.
  • USDA and academic datasets may be added to future indicator reports to enhance the robustness of regional benchmarking.
  • The Near Shore Supply Chain Tour will connect US producers with downstream buyers through on-farm events in 2025.
  • The benchmarking framework may evolve to better capture partial adoption and site-specific variation in complex practices.

WHAT THEY SAID:

Better Cotton’s US Impact Report speaks to the people on the frontline of our industry whose commitment and dedication has been intrinsic to continuous improvements at the farm-level. Collaboration is at the heart of our mission, and this report is testament to that. The insights it generates will help us take stock of progress and plan for the future.

Ashley Barrington
Senior Country Manager, US Programme
Better Cotton

Regional Realities
  • The Far West region recorded the highest yields but also the greatest irrigation dependency, reflecting operational trade-offs between productivity and water intensity.
  • Southeast farms reported smaller average acreage and more mixed mechanisation setups compared to other US cotton-producing regions.
  • In the Mid-South, cotton farms showed mid-scale mechanisation with around ten owners and workers per farm on average.
  • Southwest producers faced higher climate volatility, which influenced how consistently they could adopt biodiversity or soil-building practices.
  • Regional diversity shaped adoption pathways, with no one-size-fits-all model for implementing Better Cotton practices across the US landscape.
Methods & Mechanisms
  • Producers submitted annual self-assessments and post-harvest forms tracking yields, inputs, and sustainability practices such as cover cropping and integrated pest management.
  • Optional narrative comments allowed farmers to explain anomalies in yield, practice adoption, or input use in specific seasons.
  • Results Indicator Reports were regionally disaggregated and supported by footnotes clarifying exceptional conditions and data interpretation.
  • Report authors flagged and reviewed outlier data manually before deciding whether to retain or exclude from aggregated results.
  • Irrigation data was collected only from producers who confirmed irrigation use and was not generalised to represent the full cohort.
 
 
  • Dated posted: 4 August 2025
  • Last modified: 4 August 2025