texfash: Tell us how you got involved with SMEP's Uganda Circular Textiles project. What is the expertise that you are bringing to the project?
Michelle Wilson: WasteAid was made aware of the call for proposals from the Sustainable Manufacturing and Environment Project (SMEP), funded by the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in January 2023, and spent a year developing the proposal in conjunction with our three local partners—Uganda Tailors Association, a membership body that represents over 6,000 tailors in Ugandal the Management Training and Advisory Centre, a government owned vocation training college in Uganda which focuses on vocational training for out of school youth; and KACITA Women Entrepreneurs’ League (KaWEL), a distinguished membership-based private not-for-profit organisation dedicated to the empowerment of women and with over 500 female trader members at Owino market—the largest second-hand clothes market in Uganda.
WasteAid, which leads the consortium is a UK based international NGO and has been working in Sub-Saharan Africa since 2015, supporting countries to improve the recovery and reuse of secondary resources (otherwise known as waste!). We work across a range of secondary resource streams, including plastics, organic, e-waste and textiles. In terms of our expertise, the project was designed jointly by local actors in Uganda and WasteAid in the UK. The local actors had a sound understanding of the existing second-hand textile trade in Uganda.
In terms of the expertise WasteAid is bringing, I believe it is in helping to develop and strengthen a new value chain for waste materials that would normally end up on landfill. We use a similar approach across organic and plastic waste streams.
You have been working in other African countries like Cameroon, South Africa, Gambia and Egypt. How is the textile waste ecosystem similar to other African countries? And in what ways is it different/unique?
Michelle Wilson: I think I would clarify your question in that strictly speaking we are first of all talking about the import of second-hand clothes rather than the import of textile waste. At a cost of £2,000–3,000 per container for the wholesalers, it would seriously weaken the textile market if suppliers provided sub-standard materials to second-hand textile wholesalers in Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria or Ghana.
We are aware from recent reports that there are wide claims of how up to 40% of second-hand clothes are being thrown away in countries like Ghana. However, reports in Kenya suggest that rejection rates can be as low as 2%. In Uganda, we suspect it is higher but not reaching the 40% figure that is often used. We suspect that the rejection levels could vary per country based on the infrastructure that is in place to monitor the inflows. For landlocked countries like Uganda, secondary textiles have to go through a number of borders before it arrives and there is a lot that can happen en route.
The size of the market varies also. We know that there are a number of countries that have very developed second-hand clothes import markets. Kenya for example in 2016, imported $124 million worth of second-hand clothes, compared to Uganda at approximately $67 million and Rwanda at $17 million.
What is shared across all the countries is the way in which the second-hand textile market supports the local economy. In 2016, the second-hand clothing sales contributed £140 million to the East Africa economy and supported the livelihoods of over 400,000 people. The second-hand textile trade is able to compete with the imports of cheap clothing from Asia and also creates more jobs.