Spotlight: Africa Seconds

Shared Across the African Landscape: The Way Second-Hand Supports Local Economy

The Uganda Circular Textile project is designed to support a transition to a local textile manufacturing base by incorporating clothes that would otherwise end up in landfills into new products and design. Leading the project, which kicked off earlier this year, is WasteAid. Director of Programmes, Michelle Wilson, explains what it takes to navigate the second-hand clothing landscape in the country.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • This project is helping to build the skill set of local tailors to repurpose second-hand textile whatever their source.
  • The project seeks to answer what the rejection levels are from the second-hand clothing imports. In Kenya they are reportedly as low as 2%, but the data is not as clear for Uganda.
  • WasteAid is helping to develop and strengthen a new value chain for waste materials that would normally end up on landfill.
Wholesalers who are buying in bales from importers support the hundreds of market traders who may buy specific bale or more likely part of a bale. There are over 50,000 traders in Owino market actively selling every day in the heart of Kampala.
Brisk business Wholesalers who are buying in bales from importers support the hundreds of market traders who may buy specific bale or more likely part of a bale. There are over 50,000 traders in Owino market actively selling every day in the heart of Kampala. Hajarah Nalwadda / Flickr 2.0

texfash: Tell us  how you got involved with SMEP's Uganda Circular Textiles project. What is the expertise that you are bringing to the project?
Michelle Wilson: WasteAid was made aware of the call for proposals from the Sustainable Manufacturing and Environment Project (SMEP), funded by the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in January 2023, and spent a year developing the proposal in conjunction with our three local partners—Uganda Tailors Association, a membership body that represents over 6,000 tailors in Ugandal the Management Training and Advisory Centre, a government owned vocation training college in Uganda which focuses on vocational training for out of school youth; and KACITA Women Entrepreneurs’ League (KaWEL), a distinguished membership-based private not-for-profit organisation dedicated to the empowerment of women and with over 500 female trader members at Owino market—the largest second-hand clothes market in Uganda.

WasteAid, which leads the consortium is a UK based international NGO and has been working in Sub-Saharan Africa since 2015, supporting countries to improve the recovery and reuse of secondary resources (otherwise known as waste!). We work across a range of secondary resource streams, including plastics, organic, e-waste and textiles. In terms of our expertise, the project was designed jointly by local actors in Uganda and WasteAid in the UK. The local actors had a sound understanding of the existing second-hand textile trade in Uganda.

In terms of the expertise WasteAid is bringing, I believe it is in helping to develop and strengthen a new value chain for waste materials that would normally end up on landfill. We use a similar approach across organic and plastic waste streams.

You have been working in other African countries like Cameroon, South Africa, Gambia and Egypt. How is the textile waste ecosystem similar to other African countries? And in what ways is it different/unique?
Michelle Wilson: I think I would clarify your question in that strictly speaking we are first of all talking about the import of second-hand clothes rather than the import of textile waste. At a cost of £2,000–3,000 per container for the wholesalers, it would seriously weaken the textile market if suppliers provided sub-standard materials to second-hand textile wholesalers in Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria or Ghana.

We are aware from recent reports that there are wide claims of how up to 40% of second-hand clothes are being thrown away in countries like Ghana. However, reports in Kenya suggest that rejection rates can be as low as 2%. In Uganda, we suspect it is higher but not reaching the 40% figure that is often used. We suspect that the rejection levels could vary per country based on the infrastructure that is in place to monitor the inflows. For landlocked countries like Uganda, secondary textiles have to go through a number of borders before it arrives and there is a lot that can happen en route.

The size of the market varies also. We know that there are a number of countries that have very developed second-hand clothes import markets. Kenya for example in 2016, imported $124 million worth of second-hand clothes, compared to Uganda at approximately $67 million and Rwanda at $17 million.

What is shared across all the countries is the way in which the second-hand textile market supports the local economy. In 2016, the second-hand clothing sales contributed £140 million to the East Africa economy and supported the livelihoods of over 400,000 people. The second-hand textile trade is able to compete with the imports of cheap clothing from Asia and also creates more jobs.

Could you give us an idea about the textile waste volumes in Uganda? How much of it is because of the unusable/unwanted proportion of secondhand items that are imported? How much of it is local?
Michelle Wilson: As above, the volumes vary but according to official stats on ComTrade, 6,204 tonnes of secondary materials were exported to Uganda last year the equivalent of 213 container ships worth of clothing!

This project seeks to answer what the rejection levels are from the second-hand clothing imports. In Kenya they are reportedly as low as 2%, but the data is not as clear for Uganda. This is one of the objectives of the project to ascertain the rejection levels in Uganda and the type of materials that are rejected. We know for example in countries like Ghana that of the 10–12% materials that are rejected, 49% are the cuttings from clothing that has been repaired or altered by one of the vast networks of tailors/sewing machinists who work within the markets. The remainder would be classed 3 & 4 either deemed unwearable or damaged.

In September 2023, Uganda banned the import of second-hand clothes into the nation. It's been almost six months since the ban. How has this affected things on the ground? What are the immediate changes that you have noticed?
Michelle Wilson: We are very aware of the second-hand clothes ban and are tracking it closely. In terms of major changes, currently we have not seen a major shift in operations of any of the importers and wholesalers. A task force has been set up by the office of the prime minister to open conversation with all the different parties so that a sensible way through can be found. When you look at countries like Nigeria and South Africa that have put textile import bans in place, the result was that the trade carried on as enforcement was incredibly difficult with so many land and sea borders.

In the end, the State loses out on vital tax revenue and the second-hand traders gain the most. Irrespective of the ban there are still second-hand clothes in Uganda which are generated by the local population, particularly where the youth population is so dominant. So, whether there is a ban or not we see our project is still relevant. We see this project as helping to build the skill set of local tailors to repurpose second-hand textile whatever their source.

Looking at the subject of textile waste (as a subset of the larger secondhand clothing sector), how does the existing network operate in Uganda? 
Michelle Wilson: As previously mentioned, one of the reasons we want to implement the project is to actually generate quality data that can really shed a light on what is happening in the second-hand textile trade, how much waste is actually being generated and to see if this waste be repurposed into other products that can contribute to the local economy. What is clear is that the set up in Uganda is similar in that you have wholesalers who are buying in bales from the importers. The wholesalers in turn then support the hundreds of market traders who may buy specific bale or more likely part of a bale. There are over 50,000 traders in Owino market actively selling every day in the heart of Kampala.

Michelle Wilson / WasteAid
WasteAid spent a year developing the proposal in conjunction with three local partners—Uganda Tailors Association, Management Training and Advisory Centre, and KACITA Women Entrepreneurs’ League (KaWEL), a distinguished membership-based private not-for-profit organisation dedicated to the empowerment of women. Michelle Wilson / WasteAid

From what you have seen so far in Uganda, how much of the unusable/unwanted secondhand clothing can still be repurposed/recycled? Is there an export potential for items that are created/recreated using the textile waste? Could you elaborate?
Michelle Wilson: In terms of the level of second-hand clothing that can be repurposed, we are at the beginning of this journey to find out exactly that. The first stage is to assess the type of rejects and the potential end markets in country. The figure could be as low as 2% or high as 40%—we need to get quality data. We would be surprised that given the cost of import that the rejection rates would be of this level. Our market assessment will be able to map the materials that are rejected onto other potential markets for wipers/cloths or shredded materials for furniture stuffing. We hope that over time there may be opportunities for export and the project will also look at opening up dialogue with exporters on a range of materials.

Landfills across the Global South are burgeoning by the day. Those come with their own set of problems, particularly related to health. Are you working with local/civic authorities on this?
Michelle Wilson: We are not working directly with the landfill (Kiteezi) in Kampala, but we hope this project goes someway to ease the level of clothing dumped there each month—26 tonnes is a low estimate of the volume per day. We are hoping that this project will help intercept the materials before they end up at landfill. Once at landfill it is very difficult to do anything with the contaminated textile waste.

There would have been both individuals as well organisations who would have been working on this subject before the Uganda Circular Textiles project was launched, or even conceptualised. So, how are you fitting into the scheme of things that have been already working?
Michelle Wilson: That is a good question. Key in the design was to understand the current context and this is why the local partners MTAC and UTA, and KAWEL were vital in terms of informing the design. They have been invaluable in helping us understand the current context and we want to be very mindful of having any negative impact on existing systems that work well. For example, within the market there are hundreds of tailors who are employed to alter garments that are imported for sale. We want to ensure that our project does not disrupt this market and absorb clothing that could have been sold after tailoring. We only want the clothing that would not be able to earn an income. Recent studies show that pricing has to be carefully thought through.

What about textile-to-textile recycling? What is being done on this count?
Michelle Wilson: The level of investment for the textile-to-textile recycling is extremely high. I would say that we are really at the beginning of this journey into the repurposing of textiles.

Michelle Wilson
Michelle Wilson
Director of Programmes
WasteAid

What is shared across all the countries is the way in which the second-hand textile market supports the local economy. In 2016, the second-hand clothing sales contributed £140 million to the East Africa economy and supported the livelihoods of over 400,000 people. The second-hand textile trade is able to compete with the imports of cheap clothing from Asia and also creates more jobs.

 
 
 
  • Dated posted 12 June 2024
  • Last modified 12 June 2024