Focus Should Be on Collective Responsibility that Foster Transparency and Shared Accountability

A major player in the Enabling Systemic Circularity in Fashion project of the Forum for the Future was leading apparel manufacturer, Crystal International Group. A spokesperson of the group talks about how brands and retailers can collaborate with their manufacturing partners in making the concept of circular fashion work in reality.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • While costs may be uneven, it’s crucial to work towards equitable solutions that consider the capabilities of each player in the value chain.
  • Attributing the burden to a single player is a risky assumption. We have to recognise that the environmental impact of the industry involves market demands and consumption patterns, while suppliers are quite often considered as the culprits.
  • A global platform towards this requires strong leadership, commitment from all stakeholders, and a willingness to compromise for the greater good.
To support actions against climate crisis, Crystal International announced in March 2022 its commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. It is part of Forum for the Future's Enabling Systemic Circularity in Fashion project. Forum for the Future is a leading international sustainability organisation focused on enabling systemic and urgent action in three potentially game-changing areas.
in the business of change To support actions against climate crisis, Crystal International announced in March 2022 its commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. It is part of Forum for the Future's Enabling Systemic Circularity in Fashion project. Forum for the Future is a leading international sustainability organisation focused on enabling systemic and urgent action in three potentially game-changing areas. Crystal International

The Hong Kong-based Crystal International Group was founded in 1970. What started as a workshop with a few sewing machines and knitting looms producing sweaters, has today grown into an organisation that runs around 20 self-operating manufacturing facilities in five countries— Bangladesh, China, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Vietnam. 

The Crystal group has a workforce of approximately 80,000, and delivers over 470 million pieces of apparel every year to the best-in-class apparel brands in the world. The range of apparel products spans from denim and intimatewear to sportswear and outdoor apparel.

texfash.com: One of the key findings of the report was this: "Despite the urgency for change, stakeholders are not aligned on critical goals or the actions to achieve them." What are you doing as a stakeholder to align your own work with that of others? What are the challenges therein?
Crystal International: We have been proactive in engaging our customers and different industry organisations, such as Forum for the Future, Cascale and Global Fashion Agenda, via a mix of channels. We’ve also participated in multi-stakeholder initiatives with industry peers and non-governmental organisations, to share best practices and foster dialogue aimed at defining a shared goal for sustainability in the sector.

More importantly, we need to co-develop an aligned approach to achieve this goal. For us, this also includes benchmarking the goals and actions of industry peers. Challenges include different priorities among stakeholders, which makes it difficult to balance views of every stakeholder and especially complex to align diverse business models and interests.

Another finding is this: "The interconnecting costs of the transition towards a low-impact and ultimately regenerative sector are unevenly distributed across the value chain." But costs can never be even, because the impacts are not even and capacities are not the same either. Comments, please.
Crystal International: While costs may be uneven, it’s crucial to work towards equitable solutions that consider the capabilities of each player in the value chain. Both large and smaller players should also invest in sustainable practices without being burdened by disproportionate costs.

It’s important to have open dialogue between brands and supply chain, to understand cost, impact and capacities. 

Attributing the burden to a single player is a risky assumption. We have to recognise that the environmental impact of the industry involves market demands and consumption patterns, while suppliers are quite often considered as the culprits.

There's a lot of blame game, and also passing the buck around. For example, activists blame brands and retailers, brands blame policymakers, manufacturers blame brands. The debate itself seems to be going around in circles. How do you react to that?
Crystal International: Debating and discussion in a healthy way enable exchange of ideas, and understanding views and challenges from different perspectives. To get us out of this predicament, the key is to transform these outcomes into pragmatic actions. This has also been our consistent advocacy with various stakeholders. We should focus on collaboration and collective responsibility, by building partnerships that foster transparency and shared accountability across the entire supply chain.  

Conversations are obviously needed to sort things out. But don't you think conversations have been going on for a while, and there's already too much of that? There are too many initiatives, associations, etc. Comments, please.
Crystal International: Conversations are essential and should be coupled with actionable commitments and measurable outcomes. Through joining initiatives, we need to ensure the efforts and effective and aligned toward clear objectives. 

There's a need for one global platform and one global policy. Otherwise, this cannot work. What would your suggestions be towards achieving this? Frankly, is this even possible?
Crystal International: We support the idea of a unified global platform to facilitate collaboration and standardise sustainability practice. Nevertheless, the challenges are foreseeable, such as the differing priorities of various companies' interests.

In addition, there are already quite a number of different organisations and platforms in the industry, often governed by a similar group of representatives from major brands and manufacturers. It would be vital to build on these existing efforts, enhance coordination, and clearly define the positioning and model of any new global platforms and policies.

Achieving this requires strong leadership, commitment from all stakeholders, and a willingness to compromise for the greater good.

As a pioneering garment manufacturer, Crystal International continues to implement a series of innovations, including system transformation, digitalisation and automation and the application of advanced technology, smart factories and smart warehouses, to accelerate the change to greater sustainability.
As a pioneering garment manufacturer, Crystal International continues to implement a series of innovations, including system transformation, digitalisation and automation and the application of advanced technology, smart factories and smart warehouses, to accelerate the change to greater sustainability. Crystal International

Subir Ghosh

SUBIR GHOSH is a Kolkata-based independent journalist-writer-researcher who writes about environment, corruption, crony capitalism, conflict, wildlife, and cinema. He is the author of two books, and has co-authored two more with others. He writes, edits, reports and designs. He is also a professionally trained and qualified photographer.

 
 
 
  • Dated posted: 17 April 2025
  • Last modified: 17 April 2025