texfash: Your report points to a $6.7 billion financing gap for decarbonising Bangladesh’s apparel industry by 2030. That’s a staggering figure for a developing economy heavily reliant on this sector. And then there are the constraints of global capital markets, geopolitical risks, and the relatively thin margin structure in apparel manufacturing. So, how realistic is it to expect that such massive investment will flow timely and effectively? What kind of systemic shifts in financing models do you think are needed for this to happen?
Lewis Perkins: The financing gap reflects the real cost of transitioning a sector that’s critical to Bangladesh’s economy and global supply chains, and it is evident that the way we currently finance decarbonisation isn’t working for manufacturers operating on thin margins and without access to affordable capital. Addressing this gap will require a fundamental shift in how capital is structured and deployed. That means moving away from one-off, isolated projects and towards more programmatic financing models, where different sources of capital are blended together.
Grants can help improve the business case, brand-backed guarantees can lower risk for banks, and concessional loans from Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) can bridge the affordability gap. Realistically, closing the gap will require systemic alignment across the value chain—from buyers and investors to policymakers and development agencies. The investment is large, but the cost of inaction—both economically and environmentally—is larger. The question is not whether this capital is available, but whether the right mechanisms and trust structures can be built to direct it where it’s most needed.
Bangladesh’s energy sector is heavily dependent on fossil fuels, especially coal, while the apparel industry’s decarbonisation depends on a rapid energy transition. Considering the country’s infrastructural and policy limitations, what are the practical challenges in shifting this entrenched energy mix? Everything needs to work together: utilities, factories, and regulators to accelerate this transition without destabilising the sector itself? How hopeful are you?
Lewis Perkins: Bangladesh’s reliance on fossil fuels, particularly coal and gas, poses a significant challenge to decarbonising its apparel sector. Shifting this entrenched energy mix requires more than just technology; it demands coordinated action across policy, infrastructure, and finance.
One of the main barriers is the current energy infrastructure, which limits the scalability of renewables or low-carbon technologies like industrial heat pumps. On top of that, policy frameworks are not yet fully aligned to incentivise industrial energy transition, whether through subsidies, tariffs, or faster permitting processes.
Despite these constraints, there is room for optimism. We’re already seeing strong interest from suppliers, brands, and financiers to drive forward cleaner manufacturing solutions. But for meaningful impact, this momentum must be matched by government-led reforms and utility-scale shifts.
We are hopeful that an energy transition will happen, as there is real momentum and interest across the apparel ecosystem in Bangladesh to accelerate the renewable energy transition. While renewable energy is a small portion of Bangladesh's energy mix, around 5%, it can scale solar, wind, and hydropower across its residential and industrial sectors.
As our Landscape and Opportunities to Finance the Decarbonization of Bangladesh’s Apparel Manufacturing Sector report outlines, Bangladesh’s transition is currently constrained by systemic barriers, such as limited grid capacity, policy hurdles, and financing gaps. However, cooperative action is helping scale renewables in the country. Brands are acting on their decarbonisation targets, helping factories with on-site renewables and energy efficiency upgrades, and investors are mobilising climate capital toward scalable solutions.