Experts Debate Sustainability, Carbon Impact, and Policy Future at Natural Fibre Connect

The Natural Fibre Connect (NFC) 2025 Conference, hosted in Edinburgh, 22-23 September, exhorted: "do not write off the natural fibres in the future of textiles," as it deliberated on issues ranging from climate change, latest developments and trends on topics that unite all animal fibre industries such as regenerative agriculture, green finance, traceability social and animal welfare.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • Three subjects in particular were of particular interest: the 2026 International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists; a new line of thinking towards Carbon Impact Accounting; plus, the incoming EU Green Deal legislation that applies to textiles.
  • The future survival of our species on this planet could rest on how well more carbon will be sequestered into the ground (or sea) as opposed to be part of the everyday circle of life.
  • Hard conclusions were advised like how a 100% virgin ingredient textile product will not exist in the future.
Anne Gillespie highlighted how an area the size of Egypt was being downgraded to Land Degradation Neutrality (UN Sustainable Development Goal 15.3) each year.
Degradation of Rangelands Anne Gillespie highlighted how an area the size of Egypt was being downgraded to Land Degradation Neutrality (UN Sustainable Development Goal 15.3) each year. To reverse this effect $1bn is required each day—so think of $2.7tr as the total amount of investment required for the goal of 2030. Charles Ross

There has long been a rivalry between traditional yarns and the modern materials—but the Natural Fibre Connect conference was an opportunity for the animal-based fibres to show that they should be in those conversations. The Textile Exchange new figures show that almost all the growth in textiles has been from synthetic. The last century has seen keratin-based fibres shrink to 1% of the market—with the majority of them now being wool. This was a chance for those involved in this industry to put some facts into the public arena.

The two-day conference had several keynotes, but it was the panels that excelled themselves, alongside the direct conversations between the delegates. The week continued with a further three days of activities and visits to farms, processors, and even a distillery at the end.

The gathering offered several main take-aways. The agenda ranged from growers—spread around the world from Mongolia to Australia, but also Europe—to those with their attention on the communication channels at point-of-sale.

Three subjects in particular were of particular interest to me: the 2026 International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists; a new line of thinking towards Carbon Impact Accounting; plus, the incoming EU Green Deal legislation that applies to textiles.

Next year will see the most common land surface on this planet become recognised for the state that it is in. Rangelands are essentially grass covered savannahs that cover just over half of the planet. Up to 40% of them are in a degraded state and unable to regenerate themselves. The awareness of the South American rainforests as the lungs of earth is known about—but rangelands should have a bigger effect in the way it sequesters carbon from CO2 and through photosynthesis stores it away from becoming a greenhouse gas. The effect of the degradation in the climate is widely acknowledged and to not use nature’s solution seems foolish.

Much of the work was steered by Anne Gillespie, a grandee of the industry who highlighted how an area the size of Egypt was being downgraded to Land Degradation Neutrality (UN Sustainable Development Goal 15.3) each year. To reverse this effect $1bn is required each day—so think of $2.7tr as the total amount of investment required for the goal of 2030. Brands like H&M are already involved—they contribute specifically to the Brazil Fund—even though they source no product from that area.

There are 7 different types of rangelands, but a good focal point is Mongolia which has a population of 3m people, but a third of them living from grazing. $1 invested has been demonstrated to produce a reward of between $7 -> $30. It is suspected that a lot more issues in this subject will be raised over the course of the next year.

Biogenic Versus Ancient Carbon Debate

Dr Paul Swan’s work for the International Wool Textile Organisation was also presented as it delved into the detail of different types of carbon—essentially ‘ancient carbon’ (from sources like coal and oil: that which have taken thousands of years to create) and ‘biogenic carbon’ (part of the everyday cycle of life). The Gaia of the planet needs the carbon dioxide to live and thus grow.

However, the metrics that are applied to scales that measure the impact of textiles—like the Higg Index—are moderated by Cascale that does not take into account this difference. Natural fibres and especially animal-based fibres will always come up with a bad score. Wool has one of the highest startling figures in the Worldly calculations, but (as reminded by Scandinavian outdoor specialist Kjersti Kviseth during her presentation) recycled wool starts at completely the other end of the scale with just a score of 1.

Biogenic carbon is that which is everyday situations—so what comes out of either end of living bodies (whether CO2 or methane). There is a fixed amount of carbon here—the worry is how much of it is ‘free’ to go into the atmosphere where it commonly forms carbon dioxide or methane. The future survival of our species on this planet could rest on how well more carbon will be sequestered into the ground (or sea) as opposed to be part of the everyday circle of life. The easiest solution could be to just use biogenic carbon and leave ancient carbon locked away.

Those who are up-to-date with this field know that livestock create carbon dioxide and methane from their daily consumption (95% of CH4 comes from burps). The latter is known to break down into CO2 after a decade; the worry is now that the 1.5° rise in temperatures will be exceeded before the more dangerous greenhouse gas gets to breakdown. With methane known to be almost 30 times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide—the planet is at the end of its margin of safety. It is well known that every year since the 1995 Paris Agreement was set that energy usage has increased; although the amount of renewable energy being put into the grid has shot up—it has been overshadowed by the increased amount of fossil fuels being burnt. The planet has natural systems to cope with biogenic carbon, but not the fossil fuel usage.

This work has also combined with further research into using genetics and vaccines to reduce burping in animals. Investigations have into extended into pasture selection with different grasses to create methane inhibitors. What was clear was that this segment of fibre growing industry was taking on its impacts seriously. I suspect this debate will step up a level with the EU Green Deal metrics being applied.

Rangelands Under Pressure
  • Rangelands cover over half the planet, yet nearly 40% are degraded, reducing their ability to regenerate and sequester carbon.
  • Anne Gillespie warned that an area the size of Egypt is degraded to Land Degradation Neutrality every single year.
  • To reverse this damage, the world needs an investment of $1 billion daily until at least 2030.
  • Mongolia’s grazing economy shows that every $1 invested can generate returns between $7 and $30.
  • Global recognition of 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists will highlight their environmental and social importance.
Policy Shaping Textiles
  • The EU Green Deal initially targets electronics, batteries, and fashion, but wider industries will soon face its regulations.
  • The legislation addresses greenwashing, eco-modulation, and extended producer responsibility, reshaping how brands communicate and operate.
  • Experts warned that 100% virgin ingredient textiles will not exist in future markets under new EU requirements.
  • Digital Product Passports are emerging as a central compliance tool, though their standards remain under committee discussion.
  • French legislation surpassing EU levels takes effect from 1 October, raising pressure on brands to act responsibly.

Policy and Legislation in Spotlight

The incoming EU Green Deal was at the centre of the Policy & Legislation panel that not only stated the parameters of the regulations that are initially targeting the single use electronics, batteries, and fashion industries, but also offered sage advice as to what future developments are likely to happen as it progresses. This panel had four of the best: it was moderated by anti-greenwashing specialist Tanja Gotthardsen, and had Brunswick Group’s Emily Pompelia, 2BPolicy’s Baptiste Carriere-Pradal, the Textile Exchange’s Romane Malysza. Brunswick provide the link between policy and those it applies to, 2BPolicy is actively involved in the writing of the policy, whilst TE are an NGO that sets the facts of the market—all four need to work together (Tanja is a main commentor and influencer with deals with anti-greenwashing strategies and the implementation of them).

The session fired through so many subjects so efficiently: greenwashing, what LCAs can offer (so also what they cannot), ecomodulation, the need to contribute to the process (if you sell into the EU: it needs to be on your agenda—even if you are outside Europe), and brought attention to the Planetary Boundaries metrics. The main discussion points were around how B Corps publicity cannot be used in B2C communications going forward; the influences of both ESPR (EcoDesign) & EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility); the French legislation (above the EU Green Deal levels) which is coming in on 1 October; LCA+; the impact of the biodiversity scoring and science based targets; emotional durability—plus how the legislation is not yet perfect, but is working towards it. Hard conclusions were advised like how a 100% virgin ingredient textile product will not exist in the future. Digital Product Passport services seem to be on everyone’s desk currently, but it sums up the difference between the specialists and charlatans who are just trying to sell the next product without realising that the committee deciding the content still have not concluded.

The Natural Fibre Connect conference serves the cashmere & mohair industry so includes the clip from llamas, alpacas and sheep. They openly admit that their product will not enter the fight for the lowest priced fibre—but instead it will offer so much more than others can offer both in the performance and the impacts associated to the materials they are used to create. In a world of tight margins, sometimes having a creditable story is a better promotion than a discounted product—it certainly offers a full margin to the supply chain.

It was interesting to hear from Simon Cotton, CEO of Macnaughton Holdings Limited, a specialist weaver of woollen fabrics and accessories for the home and tartans for highlandwear, as he shared lessons learnt from creating a quality option for their product.

Peter Ackroyd, the chair of the Campaign for Wool, did the opening address in which he cut in several conversations recorded with the King of England—the Patron of CfW. The opening day was moderated by a trailblazer in the global movement toward a more sustainable and regenerative textile industry, La Rhea Pepper, whilst Day 2 had Charles Hubbard, former chair of the Sustainable Fibre Alliance keeping everybody on schedule and Cotton painting the picture of the wonders of Scotland’s textile industries.

Peter Ackroyd, the chair of the Campaign for Wool, did the opening address in which he cut in several conversations recorded with the King of England—the Patron of CfW.
Peter Ackroyd, the chair of the Campaign for Wool, did the opening address in which he cut in several conversations recorded with the King of England—the Patron of CfW. Charles Ross
The Rangelands panel at the event.
The Rangelands panel at the event. Next year will see the most common land surface on this planet become recognised for the state that it is in. Rangelands are essentially grass covered savannahs that cover just over half of the planet. Up to 40% of them are in a degraded state and unable to regenerate themselves.

Global Growers Share Their Perspectives

The first panel was centred on growers from around the world; whilst that afternoon were a whole number of workshops delivering detail on the various areas that CFN reached into before everyone coming together again to listen to discussions on supply chain traceability & transparency. That evening the majority joined in the conference dinner set above a tapestry workshop—yet another traditional craft that the country supports.

The second day had more detail on the Rangeland Stewardship Council, which was formed by the Sustainable Fibre Alliance and partners to ensure the long term health and prosperity of the grasslands, before sessions on the success of re-establishing a European merino growing drive and the conference closed with a panel that ranged from the detail of the new way to calculate embodied carbon to the opening of minds by Kjersti Kviseth, a well known Scandinavian advocate of the fibre, about the extra potential that recycled wool offers—especially for a European story of excellence.

Attendees ranged from the great of the wool industry (so CfW, the International Wool Textile Organisation, The Woolmark Company, British Wool) right down to individual herders; the big of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification were on site, as were the Textile Exchange—right through to individual brands like Johnsons of Elgin at the site of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh for the event which had an overarching theme of collaboration as the best way towards a strong future.

Natural Fibres are surrounded by stories that make their wearers advocates of the materials. The yarn itself might not win every category of performance, permeability, soft feel, windproof weaving – but it comes second to synthetics in all of them (but it does win the odour control through the natural antibiotic qualities associated); whereas a man-made yarn might be warmer or cooler—but cannot switch between the different roles required.

One of the standout stories was that of the CPMA: Collectif pour la promotion Merino D’Arles—which is European grown merino—an ideal solution for those who want to localise their production miles.

The whole NFC event was one to be appreciated in person as the conversation between delegates was as important as what was presented. The overall impression is that this part of the textile supply chain is in positive control of their future and are keen to be driven by the nirvana of both better impacts as part of a balanced planetary eco-system as well as a direct link with those who choose to wear the product.

The historic city of Edinburgh offered an ideal setting as the soft water of its rivers have been a boom to those wanting better dye and fabric finishing treatments as well as the country being the home to tweed craftmanship. Attendees gathered in iconic spaces like the Great Hall and New Library – fitting venues in a city deeply rooted in textile tradition. From Fair Isle knitwear to ancestral tartans, Scotland’s textile legacy made Edinburgh an ideal setting for a conference on the future of natural fibres.

Natural Fibres are surrounded by stories that make their wearers advocates of the materials. The yarn itself might not win every category of performance, permeability, soft feel, windproof weaving – but it comes second to synthetics in all of them (but it does win the odour control through the natural antibiotic qualities associated); whereas a man-made yarn might be warmer or cooler—but cannot switch between the different roles required.

 
 
 
  • Dated posted: 29 September 2025
  • Last modified: 29 September 2025