Polyester Textile Recycling Still Has a Long Way to Go, Says Accelerating Circularity Study

Polyester, the most widely used fibre worldwide, and a key pollutant to boot, poses many systemic and tech challenges when it comes to sorting, pre-processing and recycling, says a new study by nonprofit Accelerating Circularity.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • The report is based on two series of system trials, one in the US and the other in Europe, aimed to address recognised gaps in circular textiles capabilities by bringing together all the systems stakeholders.
  • It is expected that capacity for chemical recycling in Europe and the US will only be at industrial scale by 2027. Meanwhile, there is still the urgent need to validate these technologies with different feedstocks.
  • Automation and effective training are essential for improving efficiency, while addressing contaminants in feedstock is crucial for successful recycling outcomes.
By far the most prevalent type of polyester in the fashion industry is polyethylene terephthalate (PET), but for the context of textile-textile recycling it is important to recognise it is not the only one.
Not the only one By far the most prevalent type of polyester in the fashion industry is polyethylene terephthalate (PET), but for the context of textile-textile recycling it is important to recognise it is not the only one. Ron Lach / pexels

Significant systems gaps still exist in technology and capacity for sorting, pre-processing and recycling, and products need to designed with recycling in mind when it comes to polyester-based textile recycling, according to a new study by nonprofit Accelerating Circularity.

  • Legislation has propelled other polymer dependent industries—such as plastics—forwards in recycling technology development, but textiles still have some way to go.
  • The report, Truth or Consequences: The Global Polyester Report, is based on two series of system trials, one in the US and the other in Europe, aimed to address recognised gaps in circular textiles capabilities by bringing together all the systems stakeholders from the value chain to develop processes, relationships, business models, and materials necessary for enabling the transition of the textiles industry from a linear to a circular system.
  • The study that began in 2022 saw participation from 43 companies from all levels of the industry, including textile collection, sorting, recycling (both thermomechanical and chemical), yarn spinning, knitting, weaving, manufacturing, and retail.

THE LEARNINGS: The project study has classified the learnings under three heads: sorting, pre-processing and recycling.

Lessons in sorting: Automation and effective training are essential for improving efficiency, while addressing contaminants in feedstock is crucial for successful recycling outcomes.

  • Automated sorting technology predominantly uses NIR (Near Infrared) technology to detect fibre composition. The use of NIR technology significantly enhances accuracy compared to manual sorting. In one trial, automated technology reduced feedstock loss by 36% compared to manual sorting.
  • The use of hand-scanners based on NIR technology can be used to improve the manual sorting of feedstock but they affect speed on the sorting line.
  • Although sorting technology that can detect the fibre composition of entire garments using NIR technology is becoming more widely available, the de-trimming process remains entirely manual.
  • A trial showed it to be a misconception that workwear is consistently sorted by composition and therefore readily recyclable sorting and segregation processes still need to be implemented with care.

Lessons in pre-processing: De-trimming, still an entirely manual process in both the EU and US, is a bottleneck in terms of physical capacity and time taken. In some cases, material needed to be shipped to another country for de-trimming.

  • To ensure accuracy in de-trimming, adequate guidelines need to be set, and staff need to be trained. For accuracy and speed it is key to categorise common trims and their locations per product category of feedstock
  • De-trimming does not equal pre-processing: the required pre-processing is bespoke to the recycling technology.
  • De-trimmed garments can be accepted, but feedstock may also need to be guillotined to specific sized pieces or need an ‘agglomeration’ or ‘compaction’ process to make it compatible with a recycling technology.

Lessons in recycling: The categories most likely to have a high purity of PET is sportswear, duvets, fleece and mattresses.

  • Thermo-mechanical recycling still needs a very high purity of PET in the feedstock, any contaminants will block process filters. This includes types of polyester that aren’t PET, bi-component polymers and other additives.
  • Chemical recycling does not always produce a PET pellet ready for yarn spinning. Many chemical recycling processes produce monomers such as TPA and MEG or BHET. These chemicals need a polymerisation process prior to yarn spinning and texturising.
  • It is expected that capacity for chemical recycling in Europe and the US will only be at industrial scale by 2027. Meanwhile, there is still the urgent need to validate these technologies with different feedstocks.
  • No assumptions should be made regarding trim composition. Some care labels were shown to be TPU. Even if trims are the same polymers as main materials, such as PET buttons, they have a different viscosity and behave differently in the recycling process. They still need to be removed.

THE METHODOLOGY:  Accelerating Circularity identified end users and supply chain partners for a full spectrum of post-industrial (PI) and post-consumer (PC) textiles based on detailed T2T stakeholder mapping.

  • In total 17.4 metric tonnes of polyester feedstocks were sourced for the global polyester trials.
  • Collectively leveraging knowledge from each supply chain actor, participants came together to start to map out ‘theoretical’ feedstock requirements for the processing of polyester.
  • Standards for physical and chemical performance were developed using collective input from participants to ensure the materials produced in the trials could be assessed on their ability to meet industry standards.
  • Data was collected at each supply chain step regarding volumes, costs and specifications to build the business case for circular models.

THE CONTEXT: Polyester is the most widely used fibre worldwide. According to the Textile Exchange, polyester had a market share of approximately 57% of global fibre production in 2023.

  • Conventional polyester is made from fossil fuel-based chemicals, the primary raw material of which is crude oil. It can also be derived from gas or coal.
  • While the use of recycled polyester is growing in the fashion sector, it is primarily derived from PET bottles.
  • As the EU Textile Strategy summarised, ‘beyond the risk of misleading consumers, such a practice is not in line with a circular practice for PET bottles’.
  • There is an urgent need to address textile-textile circularity in order to reduce the 92 metric million tonnes of waste produced by the fashion sector each year.
Truth or Consequences
Truth or Consequences
The Global Polyester Report
  • Publisher: Accelerating Circularity
  • 22
  • The research included in the report was made possible through funding by the Walmart Foundation. The findings, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are those of Accelerating Circularity, Inc. alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Walmart Foundation.

 
 
  • Dated posted: 30 October 2024
  • Last modified: 30 October 2024