Second-Hand Clothes Should Be Considered Waste Only after They Have Served Their Second Life

In October, a statement from the European Recycling Industries' Confederation (EuRIC) warning that the textile reuse and recycling sector in Europe was on the verge of collapse, had sent alarm bells ringing. EuRIC Secretary-General Julia Ettinger tells texfash why the situation is so grim.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • Collapse of traditional markets in Eastern Europe and rising competition from Asian markets are putting immense pressure on European markets.
  • Without a strong demand from fashion brands for recycled textile fibres, textile recyclers are at risk of going bankrupt. This could lead to even more textile waste being sent to landfills.
  • A ‘fast-fashion tax’, could help disincentivise consumers from buying cheap, low-quality garments, which are part of the problem.
Sorting for recycling is one option, though it’s not a profitable one right now. Textile sorters aren’t making money on non-reusable textiles, and the demand in Europe isn’t high enough to absorb all that surplus.
SURPLUS SORTING Sorting for recycling is one option, though it’s not a profitable one right now. Textile sorters aren’t making money on non-reusable textiles, and the demand in Europe isn’t high enough to absorb all that surplus. Meta AI

texfash: The EuRIC statement of 21 October warns of an "unprecedented crisis." How would a breakdown of the system look on the ground? Overflowing garbage bins? Bankruptcies? Different sectors of the recycling ecosystem blaming each other?
Julia Ettinger: We’re already seeing the signs and results of this crisis. This year alone, several EU textile sorting and recycling companies have filed for insolvency. The reasons are largely what we outlined in our our latest statement: the collapse of traditional markets in Eastern Europe and rising competition from Asian markets are putting immense pressure on European markets. If this trend continues, we fear even more textile sorters and recyclers in Europe to file for bankruptcy in the coming months.

Another concrete sign of the current unprecedented crisis is the piling up of bags of clothing at collection and sorting centres. Take France, for example, (recently highlighted by France 3 Normandie). Many small associations and sorters have already gone out of business in the last months. Consequently, everything goes into the bins and accumulates. It’s a crisis that’s hard to ignore.

Your statement mentioned the gap between the oversupply of used textiles and a decline in the demand from export markets as one of the main reasons for this. The way things stand, the demand from export markets may not go up any time soon. That would mean Europe would have to deal with its own waste—the waste it generates. Would that be a fair assessment of the situation?
Julia Ettinger: Absolutely, and this is a key point. First, it is crucial to clarify that second-hand clothes should not be considered as waste – they only become waste once they have served their second life as second-hand garment. But yes, the decline in the demand from traditional second-hand markets, especially in Africa, is real. Europe’s second-hand clothes is now competing with ultra-fast fashion in these markets, which is driving prices down and reducing demand.

In this context, we need to find other viable markets and opportunities for the used clothes we are sorting in our sorting centres in Europe. But let’s be clear: sorting for recycling is one option, though it’s not a profitable one right now. Textile sorters aren’t making money on non-reusable textiles, and the demand in Europe isn’t high enough to absorb all that surplus.

You also quoted the Textile Exchange Materials Market Report of 2024 which talked about the low demand for recycled materials. This is a problem. If brands and manufacturers do not use recycled fibres, what is the use of recycling at all? Comments, please.
Julia Ettinger: Indeed, this is a critical issue and one that must be addressed urgently. Currently, most of the recycled fibres are being used for products like rags or insulation materials, which is a far cry from the goal of recycling into new garments. Right now, less than 1% of textile materials used to produce clothing are recycled into new clothing. Without a strong demand from fashion brands for recycled textile fibres, textile recyclers are at risk of going bankrupt. This could lead to even more textile waste being sent to landfills or incinerators, defeating the whole purpose of recycling in the first place.

Then there's the price gap as well. What are the reasons for the prices of second-hand textiles dropping? How much have the prices dropped? Could you give us an idea? Again, why have the costs of collection/sorting/recycling gone up? Is it because they are not able to operate at scale?
Julia Ettinger: For instance, data from the German Federal Statistical Office on the prices and the weight of all types of used textiles which have been exported from Germany to other countries around the world, shows that in 2021, Germany exported 7,624 tonnes of used textiles to Ghana, valued at €6.88 million. By 2023, that dropped to just 4,533 tonnes, valued at only €3.78 million—a significant decline. Unfortunately, this data does not differentiate between textiles for reuse and textile waste

As for the rising costs of collection, sorting, and recycling, it’s a combination of factors. The collection and sorting processes are labour and resource-intensive, and in the past few years, we’ve seen energy and labour costs soar due to inflation. Sorting and recycling have now become excessively expensive, yet the returns on these materials are shrinking. This imbalance makes it harder for recyclers to stay afloat.

If the recycling ecosystem in the EU is not working, then clearly the EU Strategy for Sustainable Textiles is riddled with loopholes. With laws and regulations already being rolled out or in the process of being so, is there any scope for course correction right now?
Julia Ettinger: The EU Textiles Strategy is just that—a strategy, not a fully formed legislative framework. The EU is still working to turn this into a solid regulatory framework. To close the gaps and avoid further damange, we need a series of legislative actions to be implemented urgently.

First and foremost, EU co-legislators must swiftly reach an agreement on the revised Waste Framework Directive and its obligations for Member States to set up EPR schemes for textiles. We need a shorter implementation period of EPR schemes to see a faster impact, and the European Commission must accelerate its work on the long-awaited secondary legislation that will establish ecodesign requirements for all new garments placed on the EU market. Mandating the use of textile-to-textile recycled content in new garments will drive demand for recycled materials and push forward sorting and recycling technologies.

But most importantly, EU policymakers need to revise their approach in light of the rise of the ultra-fast fashion. For example, we heard that the European Commission is looking at abolishing the current de minimis rules and thus imposing customs duties on low-value parcels from platforms like Temu, Shein and AliExpress (worth less than 150 euros). But we need to go further: higher taxes on all imports from those platforms, or even a ‘fast-fashion tax’, could help disincentivise consumers from buying cheap, low-quality garments, which are part of the problem.

Julia Ettinger
Julia Ettinger
Secretary-General
EuRIC

Right now, less than 1% of textile materials used to produce clothing are recycled into new clothing. Without a strong demand from fashion brands for recycled textile fibres, textile recyclers are at risk of going bankrupt. This could lead to even more textile waste being sent to landfills or incinerators, defeating the whole purpose of recycling in the first place.

EuRIC had warned that the situation is likely to raise processing costs for municipalities, potentially resulting in higher waste disposal fees for residents, with the fear that the textiles will be thrown in the residual waste instead.
Costly Waste EuRIC had warned that the situation is likely to raise processing costs for municipalities, potentially resulting in higher waste disposal fees for residents, with the fear that the textiles will be thrown in the residual waste instead. Niko Lienata / Pixabay

The EuRIC statement talks about short-term financial incentives for EU companies. But how does that help? If anything, it will certainly help small companies survive for a few days. But if the recycling system does not work, then in the long run many companies would have to shut down anyway. Comments, please.
Julia Ettinger: We remain hopeful that with the implementation of EPR schemes in all EU Member States by 2027-28, the situation will change and that the textile waste management, reuse and recycling system in Europe will be more sustainably supported. Along with the textile ecodesign requirements that should also start being implemented as of 2027-28, this will certainly have a positive impact.

However, in the short term, the sector needs help. We urgently need an ambitious financial support package for enterprises in need to get through the next two to three years. Without that, many European textile reuse, and recycling business will shut down, and we will face an even worse crisis before the long-term regulations come into effect.

But let me backtrack a bit. Earlier this year (in April), the Textiles Recycling Association had issued a similar warning. Around the same time (in March), the Vereniging Herwinning Textiel too had warned of an impending collapse. Now, we have the warning from EuRIC and Municipal Waste Europe (AISBL). If things are so bad in Europe, one shudders to think what it would be like elsewhere. Last words, please.
Julia Ettinger: It’s hard to speculate beyond Europe, but from what we’re hearing, some international players are facing similar hurdles, while others are ramping up production. The problem is that it’s tough to compete when you’re facing unfair competition and lack the necessary support. Europe has high standards, but without adequate backing, how long can recyclers stay afloat?

For Europe, one thing is clear: without decisive action and policy adjustments, the future of textile recycling in Europe—and potentially beyond—could be in jeopardy. We urge governments and stakeholders at every level to prioritise investment in collection, sorting and recycling infrastructure, implement supportive policies. We need policies that reward circularity and support businesses, and awareness campaigns to move us closer to a sustainable, circular economy for textiles.

The collection and sorting processes are labour and resource-intensive, and in the past few years, we’ve seen energy and labour costs soar due to inflation. Sorting and recycling have now become excessively expensive, yet the returns on these materials are shrinking. This imbalance makes it harder for recyclers to stay afloat.

Subir Ghosh

SUBIR GHOSH is a Kolkata-based independent journalist-writer-researcher who writes about environment, corruption, crony capitalism, conflict, wildlife, and cinema. He is the author of two books, and has co-authored two more with others. He writes, edits, reports and designs. He is also a professionally trained and qualified photographer.

 
 
 
  • Dated posted: 2 December 2024
  • Last modified: 2 December 2024