It has become increasingly clear, since the idea was first introduced in March 2022, that digital product passports (DPPs) would play a vital tool in pursuing the twin objectives of circularity and sustainability. But those are very broad objectives, and there has been little discussion on how DPPs could help in meeting clear-cut climate goals.
The closest that one gets to this micro-subject is in the form of a report titled 'Digital Product Passport: The ticket to achieving a climate neutral and circular European economy?' But this report came out in July last year, and "textiles" were mentioned only in passing.
The report had pointed out that DPP systems could be significant in the context of GHG reporting duties for companies. "As such, DPPs can play a decisive role in industrial transformation towards climate neutrality, particularly in the production of energy- and material-intensive basic materials such as aluminum and cement," it said.
It underscored the need for businesses to offer climate neutral products as an alternative choice for companies and customers. The authors wrote: "DPPs could automatically generate CO2 footprint calculations for companies and the wider value chain. Value chain measurement and reporting of CO2 emissions (as per Scope 3 reporting) could be another core application of DPPs, with the ultimate goal of redesigning products and value chains.
"An additional application would be to facilitate compliance with social governance criteria, including on modern slavery and child labour. Such information could be stored in DPPs for materials and products, and then passed along supply chains throughout their production and use phases. DPPs could become the single point of truth for such data."
The report culled out insights from an intensive dialogue with members of the CLG (Corporate Leaders Groups) Europe Taskforce for climate neutral and circular materials and products and other identified business stakeholders across sectors and value chains.
The relevant ideas that emerged from the discussions were summarised thus: "DPPs could serve as digital-based supply chain compliance tools to monitor and report indicators, such as Scope 3 GHG emissions. This could result in long-term benefits for businesses, especially if other administrative burdens could be reduced. Based on standardised data, DPPs could also allow a direct comparison with other products and businesses on carbon footprints, circularity and recycling beyond recycled content. This could be facilitated by the inclusion of blockchain certificates for low carbon materials, which provide useful data to support the sustainability claims."
The ideas dwelt on the benefits of DPPs to store and share information throughout a product’s lifecycle. Those were, however, broad takes on the subject. There were some case studies, including one from the construction industry. But comparing bricks with garments is akin to comparing chalk with cheese. Or, something like that.