Let’s go to rural India where labour and land are available but people migrate for work

The big picture is that China, once a dominant player, is under pressure and buyers are desperately looking to diversify risks. India has suddenly become important as it is the only other place with a large vertically integrated textile chain, but does not have the huge capacities. Sarbajit Ghose, Managing Director of Laguna Clothing, does some hard talk as he takes a 360-degree view of how sourcing works.

Long Story, Cut Short
  • India not equipped to meet high demand. Some companies will ride on opportunities and grow and establish themselves in global market; some will slip. This window of opportunity will not last long. Other countries are also building up capacity.
  • States like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkand and even West Bengal and Odisha are where industries need to be set up—where labour and skillsets are more easily available, and even more competitive than Bangladesh today.
  • We have had too much of policies. We have had more seminars on how India can become competitive instead of actually becoming competitive.
You can do any amount of IT integration, digital transformation, sustainability—but ultimately a tailor has to stitch a product. If you are always struggling to fill the machines, you are never going to make it big.
Tailored for India You can do any amount of IT integration, digital transformation, sustainability—but ultimately a tailor has to stitch a product. If you are always struggling to fill the machines, you are never going to make it big. Gabriel Santos / Unsplash

Talking of apparel exports, here’s a flat question: what is the broad picture that you see?
There is a big company in Hong Kong called Esquel, which was doing 100 million shirts and has now run into problems. Their containers were not allowed into the US. They were a dominant player in the mid-to-premium segment. They had spinning mills in the Xinjiang region from where cotton has been banned (into the US), and they are in big trouble. People were alleging that they were using forced labour and so their goods were banned. Now, there is a huge vacuum of a 100 million shirt capacity that has to be replaced. Hugo Boss was buying 2 million shirts from them, and in another two years they want to get out of there (China). So, they were desperately looking for people like us.

After COVID-19, especially in the formal shirts segment, many shops in the West did not have a white shirt. People had not bought formal shirts because of work-from-home, but when everything opened up, there was a spike in demand. We are—perhaps for the first time—in a situation where customers are queuing up, begging us for capacity because of which our constraint is now about building up production capacity. We have been doubling capacity every two years.

Events like wars, etc, will affect demand and supply here and there. But the big picture is that China which was a dominant player is under pressure and buyers are desperately looking to diversify risks. India has suddenly become very important as it is the only place to have a large vertically integrated textile chain after China. Countries like Bangladesh were getting fabric from China and now people are turning to India—but India does not have the huge capacities. Plus, because of COVID-19 many factories have shut down and so capacities have obviously come down as well. Brands are looking at companies that have established themselves in the last 15 years in certain categories—a company like ours; they know our reputation. So, they are coming to us. This is the broad picture.

Where is it that India is missing out?
India is not equipped to meet the high demand. Some companies will ride on the opportunities and grow and establish themselves in the global market; some will slip. This window of opportunity will not last long. Other countries are also building up capacity quickly. People are realising that just depending on China or Vietnam or Bangladesh is risky. Sri Lanka too is in a financial crisis. Vietnam had COVID issues. China has been blacklisted, and so buyers want to diversify. Their thought is they were not buying much out of India, but let’s give 5% of our requirements to India which in itself is too much. So, the well-established who have capitalised well stand a very good chance to grow.

Opportunity India again, but India keeps on losing out on them. Do you think India will once again lose this opportunity or it will buck up and catch up?
Players that are well established like Arvind and Vardhaman do not know what to do with the demand. Say, the yarn business—because cotton from China is being blacklisted, there is a huge demand from India. Cotton growers don’t know what to do as they have run out of cotton. Prices have gone up dramatically. In terms of garmenting, many units—even of established players–have not fared too well. But the Eastmans of the world are well established in garmenting and so they are growing. Now, is there going to be an improvement? Yes. Because some of the capacity has come down because of COVID-19. Earlier, China and Bangladesh were dominant players and extremely competitive. They were giving prices we could not match. Now in spite of the competitive pricing, Bangladesh is choc-a-bloc and has run out of capacity. China as I have been reiterating is in disfavour. So, the pressure is high not only from the market, but from the environment too. I can’t predict what will happen in a few years, but we see it as a very good opportunity.

Cotton controversy. How is this going to impact India?
The cotton from Xinjiang is problematic. At the global level, retail customers are becoming more knowledgeable and demanding and asking for transparency in the supply chain. It is not that I just give you a shirt at a good value and quality. They now want to know where the cotton came from, where the yarn came from, was the labour at the yarn unit being exploited, is there a sustainability element—these things have become increasingly critical. Earlier at the retail level, there was a lot of greenwashing being done because people did not trace back. But now, controversies are erupting. So again, there is an opportunity. If a company is going to be proactive and demonstrate to the market and customers that they are serious about sustainability and traceability, and have the highest standards, they will have a cutting edge. People will say I don’t mind paying an extra dollar to these suppliers because I know they are honest and reliable suppliers.

All our factories are in the villages. We are trying to set up one in Jharkhand in a village. If you try to make a factory near the bustling metropolises, you are doing the wrong thing; it is not going to work like it did three decades back. You have to go to rural areas—to the east of India—where labour and land is available, where people do not have to migrate to big cities in search of livelihood and live terrible lives.

Sarbajit Ghose
Managing Director
Laguna Clothing LLP
Sarbajit Ghose

What can India do to capitalise on this opportunity that keeps coming and we keep squandering?
The simple answer is that we are not desperate enough. Bangladesh, for instance, was a poor country, with no IT and no other sources of exports. So, they had no other choice but to get into this industry, get hammered by their customers, and then emerge as one of the strongest players in the world and because of this—on the back of one industry—their economic indices have dramatically improved. Today, their economic performance per capita is much better than that of India, and certainly much better than West Bengal, their so-called sister state. India as a country did not really understand the importance of this industry because they have had multiple baskets like technology, value-added jobs, etc, doing well. Except for a few clusters like Tiruppur where people really work hard, the industry has not received the importance it deserves.

All our factories are in the villages. We are trying to set up one in Jharkhand in a village. If you try to make a factory near the bustling metropolises, you are doing the wrong thing; it is not going to work like it did three decades back. You have to go to rural areas—to the east of India—where labour and land is available, where people do not have to migrate to big cities in search of livelihood and live terrible lives.

States like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkand and even West Bengal and Odisha are where industries need to be set up—where labour and skillsets are more easily available, and even more competitive than Bangladesh today. Most of the successful garment exporters are sitting pretty; they made good money during the COVID-19 days. They don’t want to get into the pressure of fighting it out in Jharkhand. There are difficulties too for us, but strategically there is no choice. Most of the factories in the cities are struggling with labour. You can do any amount of IT integration, digital transformation, sustainability—but ultimately a tailor has to stitch a product. If you are always struggling to fill the machines, you are never going to make it big.

The new foreign trade policy has not yet been drafted. What would you like to see in the policy so that Indian manufacturers, exporters get the boost they need?
You know what—we have had too much of policies. We have had more seminars on how India can become competitive instead of actually becoming competitive. There is a lot of talk, but nothing on the ground. If I was in the garment industry, I would earmark the poor states in the east—the so-called BIMARU regions—and make sure that the whole industry is concentrated there. We make it easy for the entrepreneurs to come there and build the industry. They have set up skill training centres and so people are getting trained; people are making money as they skill the people, but there are no jobs! So, they go to Tiruppur and find that they can’t eat idli dosa everyday—two different palates. So, after 3–4 months they return.

Very fundamental needs on the ground need to be met. Ultimately, what does a person want? Anyone wants to earn a living, close to the family in the village and if the industry goes close to them, and if the policymakers, state government makes it easy for the industry to come there, that’s it. It is not rocket science. There will be no migration and we will have happier labour. The whole issue of growth without generating jobs—this controversy that keeps coming up every now and then will be eliminated. You are actually targeting the people who need jobs.

One of the things that countries like China, Japan or Korea did when they developed was that they went through a phase where they did labour-intensive exports in textiles, apparel or footwear. All these industries do not require very high skilled labour but are labour-intensive, and it brought them up and we can see the results in Bangladesh also.

To me, it is a very simple thing that can be done. Focus on the poor states where labour is available, make sure that the state governments make it conducive for people to go there, ensure that the infrastructure is built up, and then go ahead.

There are a lot of good policies but when it comes to implementation it is zilch. People make money out of export processing zones. So, there are no facilities that were promised, and so people look for their own solutions and that becomes costly, cumbersome. Fundamentally, that is not difficult policy wise. Policies need to be executed well.

Richa Bansal

RICHA BANSAL has more than 30 years of media industry experience, of which the last 20 years have been with leading fashion magazines in both B2B and B2C domains. Her areas of interest are traditional textiles and fabrics, retail operations, case studies, branding stories, and interview-driven features.

 
 
 
  • Dated posted: 28 April 2022
  • Last modified: 28 April 2022